Sizing Heat Transfer Stations in District Heating

A heat transfer station (HTS) passes the network heat to the building-side heating circuits and domestic hot water preparation, usually through a plate heat exchanger with approach temperatures of 2—5 K. Dimensioning rests on the heat load for space heating and DHW, and on diversity factors that can cut the DHW peak load to just 10—18 % of the sum of individual loads across 100 dwelling units. An undersized station falls short of demand on cold days; an oversized one drives up investment costs and return temperatures.

Structure and components

A typical house transfer station is built from a handful of core components. The primary-side connection carries shut-off valves, a strainer and a differential pressure controller. A heat exchanger provides the hydraulic separation between network and building for an indirect connection. A control valve with actuator sets the primary-side flow rate, and a heat meter records consumption. On the secondary side sit the circulation pump, the safety group and the expansion vessel.

Hydraulic separation through a plate heat exchanger is standard in most networks, because it shields the network from pressurization issues and permits different operating pressures on the primary and secondary sides.

Domestic hot water preparation

In many cases the domestic hot water (DHW) preparation sets the peak output of the transfer station and therefore its dimensioning. Two basic systems are distinguished.

Indirect preparation with storage tank

A DHW storage tank, typically 200 to 500 litres for single-family houses and 500 to 2000 litres for multi-family houses, is charged from the network through a heat exchanger. The required charging power depends on the chosen charging time and the storage volume:

$\dot{Q}_{\text{DHW}} = \frac{V_{\text{st}} \cdot \rho \cdot c_p \cdot \Delta T}{t_{\text{charge}}}$

with the storage volume $V_{\text{st}}$, the density $\rho$, the specific heat capacity $c_p$, the temperature difference $\Delta T$ (typically 45 K when heating from 10 to 55 °C) and the charging time $t_{\text{charge}}$.

The advantage of a storage system is its lower connection power: the tank can be charged over a longer period, say 2 to 4 hours, so the network peak output stays lower. The drawback is the legionella risk at storage temperatures below 60 °C, which calls for regular thermal disinfection.

Direct preparation (instantaneous principle)

In a fresh water station, the drinking water is heated in flow-through mode through a plate heat exchanger. Because no hot drinking water is stored, the legionella risk practically disappears. In return, this variant needs a much higher peak output, since the entire tap demand must be met in real time.

For a single-family house with a peak tap demand of about 15 l/min at 45 °C and a cold water temperature of 10 °C, this yields:

$\dot{Q}_{\text{peak}} = \dot{V} \cdot \rho \cdot c_p \cdot (T_{\text{hot}} - T_{\text{cold}}) = 0{,}25 \; \text{l/s} \cdot 4{,}18 \; \text{kJ/(kg}\cdot\text{K)} \cdot 35 \; \text{K} \approx 37 \; \text{kW}$

This value shows why diversity factors matter so much in network sizing: not all buildings tap at full heat load at the same moment.

Diversity factors

The diversity factor $f_{\text{div}}$ describes the ratio of the actually simultaneously occurring output to the sum of all installed connection loads:

$\dot{Q}_{\text{network}} = f_{\text{div}} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{n} \dot{Q}_{\text{connection},i}$

Diversity decreases as the number of consumers increases, since individual demand peaks fall at different times. In practice, space heating diversity and DHW diversity are treated separately.

Space heating diversity

Diversity for space heating is comparatively high, since all buildings heat simultaneously at low outdoor temperatures. Typical values:

DHW diversity

DHW diversity is significantly lower, since tapping events are short and statistically distributed:

These values draw on DIN 4708 and on empirical data from the operation of existing networks. For buildings with storage-tank systems, DHW diversity at network level largely disappears, since the tanks can be charged asynchronously.

Sizing for different building types

Single-family house (new build, KfW-55 standard)

• Heat load: 4 to 6 kW
• DHW output (instantaneous): 30 to 40 kW
• DHW output (storage, 300 l): 8 to 12 kW
• Typical connection load: 15 to 20 kW (with storage)

Multi-family house (20 dwelling units, existing building)

• Heat load: 80 to 120 kW
• DHW output (central fresh water station): approx. 120 kW
• DHW diversity factor: approx. 0.35
• Typical connection load: 120 to 160 kW

Commercial building (office, 2000 m$^2$)

• Heat load: 60 to 100 kW
• DHW output: low (5 to 10 kW)
• Typical connection load: 70 to 110 kW

Supply temperature and approach temperature

The required primary-side supply temperature depends on the secondary-side requirements plus the approach temperature of the heat exchanger. The approach temperature $\Delta T_{\text{approach}}$ is the minimum temperature difference between the primary and secondary sides:

$T_{\text{VL,primary}} \geq T_{\text{VL,secondary}} + \Delta T_{\text{approach}}$

For plate heat exchangers in transfer stations, typical approach temperatures lie between 2 and 5 K. DHW preparation to 55 °C with a 3 K approach therefore calls for a primary supply temperature of at least 58 °C.

The return temperature likewise has a strong bearing on network efficiency. Return temperatures below 40 °C reduce heat losses and widen the usable temperature spread; see return temperatures. On the primary side, the secondary return temperature is undercut by the approach temperature:

$T_{\text{RL,primary}} = T_{\text{RL,secondary}} - \Delta T_{\text{approach}}$

Buffer storage on the network side

In some network concepts, a central or decentralised thermal energy storage tank on the primary side smooths out load peaks. Its size depends on the expected peak output and the desired bridging time:

$V_{\text{buffer}} = \frac{\dot{Q}_{\text{peak}} \cdot t_{\text{buffer}}}{\rho \cdot c_p \cdot \Delta T_{\text{buffer}}}$

For a peak output of 500 kW, a bridging time of 30 minutes and a usable spread of 30 K, a storage volume of about 7200 litres results.

Designing the transfer station

The heat transfer station is a central element of every district heating network and deserves particular care in its design. Whether DHW preparation is storage-based or instantaneous strongly shapes the connection load and thus the whole network dimensioning. Diversity factors cut the required network output well below the sum of the individual connections and should be applied realistically during planning. In VICUS Districts, transfer stations can be entered in the network model with their performance data, and their influence on the overall hydraulics simulated. Low approach and return temperatures make for an efficient network, though they have to be weighed against the investment cost of larger heat exchangers.

Further reading: Heating Curves — temperature control at the building side of the transfer station, Network Temperatures in District Heating Networks — supply temperatures that determine transfer station design, Pressure Loss Calculation in District Heating Networks — hydraulic design including station pressure losses, Prosumers in District Heating Networks — bidirectional transfer stations for feed-in and consumption.

References and Standards

• AGFW FW 515 — Control and Regulation of District Heating Networks
• DIN EN 12828 — Heating systems in buildings — Design for water-based heating systems
• Nussbaumer, T.; Thalmann, S. (2016): Planungshandbuch Fernwärme. EnergieSchweiz / Swiss Federal Office of Energy.